Link Info

 

 

Breaking News From Consumer Reports

 
 
For user convienance we have added this Breaking News Page containing news and reviews directly from consumer reports. Consumer Reports is the leader in saftey and quality reviews that the world can trust.
 
 
Security threat: 'Critical' Adobe Reader and Acrobat danger

Security threat: 'Critical' Adobe Reader and Acrobat danger

AdobeLogo

Adobe warned of a zero-day 'hole,' or security threat, in its Reader and Acrobat software that is already "in the wild." That is, the malicious code to exploit this flaw is already available to hackers and online criminals.

The critical vulnerability was discovered on Tuesday and affects Adobe Reader 9.3.4 and earlier versions for Windows, Macintosh, and UNIX, and Adobe Acrobat 9.3.4 and earlier versions for Windows and Macintosh.

No specific details were given about the software's flaw, announced in the company's critical security advisory yesterday. However, Adobe warns that hackers may use this vulnerability to crash and take over unsuspecting victims' computers.

The company says it is working on a fix, but advises computer users to "follow security best practices by keeping their anti-malware software and definitions up to date."

Don't know what exactly are "security best practices" or the best "anti-malware software" programs are? Check out the Consumer Reports Guide to Online Security.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Q&A: Can CFLs be used in vintage lighting fixtures?

Q&A: Can CFLs be used in vintage lighting fixtures?

Sconces Answer: Yes, I use them in my lights (see photo). Just like new fixtures, older fixtures were designed to handle up to a certain wattage bulb, usually 40, 60 or 100 watts. Compact fluorescent lightbulbs use far fewer watts than standard incandescent bulbs to deliver the same amount of light. For example, you can replace a 60-watt incandescent with a 13 to 15 watt CFL. In addition to saving you about six dollars per year per bulb, CFLs also burn cooler so there should be no problem overtaxing your older fixture. Plus CFLs last much longer, so you won’t have to replace them as often.  That’s especially nice if you have to remove fragile or hard-to-replace covers on your old fixture to replace the bulb. (In my house that's my job, so it’s my fault if anything breaks.)

Before you go shopping, measure the height of the shade. You may need to use a micro CFL so that the bulb doesn’t stick out. Or you can buy a covered CFL, but our tests of CFLs have found that these may not be as bright so you might need a slightly higher watt CFL.

—Celia Kuperszmid Lehrman
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Google and Apple: The next battle is "Smart TV"

Google and Apple: The next battle is "Smart TV"

GoogleTV_AppleTV

Do you like your smart phone? Then you're going to love your "smart TV." At least that's the position being taken by Google and Apple, as their battle for operating-system supremacy jumps from cell phones to your living room HDTV. The biggest difference: Apple TV is an add-on box, while Google TV will largely be built into TVs and Blu-ray players.

Already, many TVs, Blu-ray players and videogame systems can provide access to online content, including streaming movies from services such as Amazon, Netflix and Vudu, Pandora and Slacker Internet radio stations, and photo-sharing sites such as Flickr and Picasa. Clearly TV manufacturers hope to lure new customers with these new smart TVs.

But the entry of Apple and Google raises the stakes, especially since both have a robust marketplace for third-party applications. As we've already reported, Apple recently revamped its Apple TV television add-on, which brings Internet content, such as pay-per-view movies and TV shows, to TVs that lack online access. Netflix subscribers can also use the box to stream movies at no additional cost. Apple also dropped the price of Apple TV to $99 from $299. But right now the content is still somewhat limited, with only ABC and Fox providing the 99-cent TV show rentals. And other players, such as Roku and Boxee, either offer or plan to offer similar add-on devices with similar capabilities.

TV manufacturers seem to prefer an integrated approach, building online capability into their sets. So far, that leaves Google TV in a better position, although it hasn't yet disclosed its content partners. (There will also be add-on products, from Sony, Dish, and Logitech.) It's assumed that Google TV will add the ability to browse the Internet, something currently lacking on most web-connected TVs, and it's likely the company will leverage its YouTube subsidiary. Sony, for example, has already announced support for the Android-based Google TV platform; the first sets are expected to arrive in November. And according to a report from Bloomberg, Samsung is also considering Google for its TVs.

But other major TV companies, including Panasonic, have so far been satisfied to develop and use their own platforms for integrating online content.

The dark horse in the race, however, is how the traditional TV service providers—cable, satellite and telcos—respond. All are experimenting with ways to marry traditional linear video programming with online content within the set-top boxes rented by their subscribers every month. Remember that the DVR didn't meet with widespread success until it was incorporated as a cable-box feature.

Do you have an Internet-connected TV, Blu-ray player, game system or TiVo? If so, tell us what you like most about it, what applications you use most frequently, and what features you'd most like to see added.

—James K. Willcox

Next Steps

All TV Ratings
Subscribers can view and compare all TV Ratings.
Recommended TVs
Look at the ones that we chose as the best of the best.
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Adding insult to injury, some towns levy automobile "crash tax"

Adding insult to injury, some towns levy automobile "crash tax"

BrokenWindshield If you have an at-fault accident on certain stretches of Interstate 5 near Fresno, Calif., you may suffer an extra pain: A $370 bill from the Fresno County Fire Protection District. “We know how much our equipment costs to operate per hour, and we bill that amount,” says Michelle Martinez, Administrative Officer 2 for the district.

Cash-strapped communities around the nation are considering crash response fees to beef up the revenue side of faltering budgets. Exactly how many is unknown, but five private companies have lined up to do the dirty work of billing—for a percentage of the take. “This has really exploded around the country because of the recession. Major cities are getting involved now,” says Ed Grubbs, president of EF Recovery.

Last July, San Francisco’s city council approved an ordinance that empowers the fire department to charge at-fault drivers $249 to $498 if firefighters clean up vehicle fluids spilled in a crash. The city expects to milk $600,000 a year from 4,000 motor vehicle accidents per year.

Depending on the jurisdiction, such fee rules vary as to who gets charged (all vs. only non-resident at-fault drivers),  how much ($100 to $2,200),  and for what (fire, police, equipment operating costs, services beyond basic response).  Ten states, including Florida, Indiana, and Pennsylvania, prohibit such charges, according to the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. 

Consumers don’t have much choice in the matter. There’s no easy way to know if a town you’re traveling through imposes such fees, and of course no one plans to crash anywhere. Emergency response personnel probably won’t disclose the fees before services are rendered, so consumers can’t give informed consent, and shaken accident victims are unlikely to say “No thanks,” to police and firefighters. 

Your auto insurance may or may not cover these charges. For example, State Farm will cover fees related to the extrication services provided by a fire department that allows more expedient treatment of injuries to an insured, but the cost of extinguishing of a fire in an unoccupied vehicle is generally not covered. (Consumer Reports recently reported on sure-fire ways to save money on auto insurance; our unique Ratings highlights which insurance companies do the best job of satisfying customers in claims servicing.)

If your insurer says no, the municipality or its billing vendor may or may not go after you. What if you ignore the bill? EF Recovery lets the municipality decide how aggressively to pursue non-payers. Fire Recovery USA is even more hands-off: “We’re a billing service, not a collection agency… After a reasonable period of time, the account will be written off.” That policy may reveal the unfairness of helping people in need during an emergency, then sending them a bill.—Jeff Blyskal
 
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Daily electronics deals

Daily electronics deals

Today's electronics deals, courtesy of The Consumerist:

  • Ewiz.com: 2TB Samsung EcoGreen F3 HD203WI SATA2 5400rpm 32MB Hard Drive for $105 with Free Shipping
  • Ewiz.com: Asus RT-N16 Gigabit Wireless Router w/ USB Storage & Printer & Media Server for $78 with Free Shipping
  • Dell: Sony HD 1080p Digital Camcorder for $159.99 w/ Free Shipping
  • Newegg: Acer Aspire 15.6" Laptop 2.2GHz w/ 3GB DDR3 Memory + 250GB Drive for $349.99 w/ Free Shipping

Entertainment

  • Tanga.com: Garden Design Magazine For only $4.99 [w/ coupon code GARDEN]
  • GameFly.com: Final Fantasy XIII (360/PS3) Pre-Owned for $20 with Free Shipping
  • GameFly.com: Silent Hill: Shattered Memories (Wii) Pre-Owned for $13 with Free Shipping

Neither Consumer Reports nor The Consumerist receive anything in exchange for featuring these deals; the posts are intended to be purely informational. These deals are often fleeting, with prices changing or products becoming unavailable as the day progresses.

These posts are not an endorsement of the featured products or the Web sites that sell them—though some of the sites may be included, and recommended, in our Ratings of retailers for computers and other major electronics (both available to subscribers). Price shouldn't be your only criterion. Be wary of lower-priced deals that seem too good to be true, and check return policies for restocking fees and other gotchas.

For general buying advice for many of the products on sale above, check out our free Buying Guides.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
2011 Ford Mustang V6 vs 1970 Mustang Boss 302: Who's the real boss?

2011 Ford Mustang V6 vs 1970 Mustang Boss 302: Who's the real boss?

1970-Ford-Mustang-Boss-Consumer-Reports
The 1960s and early '70s are remembered by many car enthusiasts as the glory days of the American muscle car—those pavement-ripping, tire-shredding, rumbling V8-powered domestics that could blast screaming from stoplight to stoplight, as long as the road stayed straight. As you might guess, finesse really wasn't part of the formula. 

Don't get me wrong: I've got nothing against muscle cars, and in fact I'm part of the generation that grew up with Pontiac GTOs and Plymouth Road Runners on the brain. But a funny thing has happened in the 40-odd years since various hot Chevrolet Camaros, Dodge Challengers, and Ford Mustangs burbled their way to the drive-in on Saturday nights and to the drag strip Sunday mornings: technology, as it tends to do, has marched on.

We just tested a V6-powered Chevrolet Camaro and Ford Mustang for the October issue of Consumer Reports magazine, and found, among other things, that both put out more horsepower than many V8s from the muscle-car era, all the while delivering faster acceleration, better cornering, and much better fuel economy.
Back in 1970, Consumer Reports tested a Mustang Boss 302 (shown above), a high-performance model inspired by racing Mustangs of the era. A comparison of the Boss' performance versus our new Mustang V6 is something of an eye opener. Keeping in mind that testing methods and engines have come a long way in the last 40 years, and that horsepower ratings are now more conservative than they used to be, here's a look at how the Mustangs stack up.
  1970 Mustang Boss 302 2011 Ford Mustang V6
Drivetrain 4.9-liter (302 cubic inch) V8, 4-speed manual transmission

3.7-liter (226 cubic inch) V6, 6-speed manual transmission

Horsepower* 290 (SAE gross) 305 (SAE net)
Vehicle weight 3,335 pounds 3,540 pounds
Acceleration, 0-60 8.0 seconds 6.2 seconds
1/4 mile time 16.0 seconds 14.8 seconds
1/4 mile speed 93 mph 98 mph
Overall fuel economy 11 mpg 24 mpg
Braking, 60-0 mph 130 ft. 134 ft.
*Horsepower figures based on testing standards established by the Society of Automotive Engineers.

2011-Ford-Mustang-V6-Consumer-Reports
Horsepower ratings were "SAE gross" back in the day, meaning that the rating was based on an engine unencumbered by things like an alternator, water pump, and other equipment that an engine needs to function in the real world. A more realistic approach took hold in the early 1970s, known as "SAE net" that better approximates that parasitic demands on the engine and reflects performance of an installed engine. (A more precise approach has been implemented in recent years, known as SAE Certified Power.) All this means the new V6 has significantly more horsepower than the old Boss 302 if measured to the same standard.
 
The fact that we measured a shorter stopping distance with the Boss 302 is more of a head scratcher, and it probably has something to do with the different testing methods and facility used at the time.

Still, the statistics make for an interesting comparison. I like old Mustangs, but new ones do tend to show them who's boss.

Got a passion for muscle cars? Check out our new Mustang vs Chevrolet Camaro video.

Jim Travers 

Next Steps

All Sporty car Ratings
Subscribers can view and compare all Sporty car Ratings.
Recommended Sporty cars
Look at the ones that we chose as the best of the best.
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Get relief from your end-of-summer allergies

Get relief from your end-of-summer allergies

Seasonal allergiesNothing’s worse than a hacking cough and drippy-faucet nose in 90-degree weather. But if your sneezing, coughing, and congestion comes with itchy eyes and seems to be lasting longer than a typical cold, it could be seasonal allergies. According to the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, the end of summer marks the beginning of ragweed season—and for 10 to 20 percent of Americans that means allergies.

Hay fever can make you feel miserable, and it’s difficult to treat. Sixty percent of allergy sufferers we talked to in a survey earlier this year had limited success managing their itchy eyes, sinus pain, sneezing, and other symptoms. If you’re searching for relief, first and foremost—make sure it’s an allergy you’re treating and not a cold or something else. One way to tell is to look at the duration of your symptoms. A cold can last from about 3 days to 2 weeks; allergies tend to stick around longer, typically weeks or months. Our symptoms tool can help you find out how bad your symptoms are compared to others and what you can do about them, whether it’s avoiding the things that trigger allergies, finding the right medicine, or getting allergy shots.

If avoiding the things that trigger your allergies, works for you, stick with it. In our survey, only one in five respondents said they were "highly satisfied" with the avoidance measures, such as staying indoors with the windows shut and the air-conditioner on and doing outdoor activities on low-pollen days. But when these tactics worked, they were even more effective than taking over-the-counter medicine for allergies. If that doesn’t do the trick, you’ll want to speak with your doctor about other treatment options, including prescription and OTC drugs. Seeing a doctor can help pinpoint the drugs and allergy-avoidance strategies that work best for you.

Our new Best Buy Drugs report on antihistamines highlights a relatively newer class of medications called second-generation antihistamines widely used to relieve the allergy symptoms. Lower-cost generic loratadine, the active ingredient in the nonprescription drug Claritin (a best-selling prescription drug until 2002 when it became available without a prescription), has been shown to effectively relieve symptoms of hay fever, hives, and other allergies, and is our Best Buy pick. And since it’s available without a prescription, you can conveniently pick it up from your local pharmacy and be on your way to breathing a little easier.

Ginger Skinner

For more on drug options to treat your allergies, take a look at our free Best Buy Drugs report on antihistamines.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
How to avoid lead, cadmium, and other heavy metals in children's products

How to avoid lead, cadmium, and other heavy metals in children's products

Lead in children's productsDon't allow children to have or play with cheap metal jewelry. If your children tend to put things in their mouths, add to that brass keys, barrettes, and charms. (See what we found when we tested products for lead and cadmium.)

Take an inventory of your children's toys and check them against the recall list at www.cpsc.gov, which has photos and descriptions of products recalled for lead or cadmium. Also check the list if you're buying used items.

Consider do-it-yourself test kits, which can be useful though limited screening tools. Our September 2008 tests found that Homax Lead Check and Abotex Lead Inspector kits were somewhat reliable in detecting surface lead but were not good at detecting lead within a product.

Don't drink from garden hoses, which might contain lead that can leach into water. As a precaution, wash your hands immediately after handling power cords, extension cords, and even strings of holiday lights.

Learn more in our full report on lead and cadmium in children's and adults' products.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Smart Phones - from Consumer Reports

Smart Phones - from Consumer Reports

For the September issue, Consumer Reports tested forty smart phones to find those worth buying. Smart Phones - CR Podcast
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
First Look: Snapper's NTX2346 lawn tractor

First Look: Snapper's NTX2346 lawn tractor

RR-LT-Snapper-307 This might seem like an odd time of year to shop for a lawn tractor unless you're trolling the sale section of  your local home center or dealer. But our first look at the Snapper NTX2346 indicates that it might well be a contender any time of year.

At $2,600, the mower isn’t cheap and its 46-inch deck has three blades, which typically don't cut as evenly as two. But performance that so far looks promising, plus some helpful features, caught our attention.

“The Snapper’s side-discharge left us favorably impressed,” says Peter Sawchuk, program leader for Consumer Reports mower and power tools testing. “And its smooth steering is as tight as any lawn tractor we’ve seen.”
 
We haven’t yet gotten to test the Snapper’s mulching or bagging capability yet. But in the meantime, I got a look at what else $2,600 buys you. The foot-operated, hydrostatic transmission is what we expected at that price level. And the engine is a twin-cylinder, 23-horsepower Briggs Professional Series with overhead valves.
 
Like the Snapper NXT walk-behind mower we mentioned in July, the tractor also has an LED screen that can display a clock, trip and total hours, and timers for changing the oil, replacing the air filter, and sharpening the blades along with a fuel level indicator similar to that on your car. The mesh seat might seem like a gimmick. Nevertheless, I certainly appreciated it while trying out the Snapper on a recent sunny afternoon that topped 92 degrees.
 
We also like the heavy-duty stamped deck with electric cutting-height adjustment (and the cut height displayed right on the LED screen) as well as a washout port—not new but nevertheless welcome. The cigarette-lighter outlet for charging your cell phone, iPod, or other device with such charging capability could come in handy. And for whatever reason people want headlights on their lawn tractors (manufacturers don’t recommend you cut in the dark) the lights are LED, the first we’ve seen on a lawn tractor.
 
We’ll be adding the Snapper NTX2346 to our Ratings soon, and we’re already compiling our wish list for mowers we’ll test this winter at our test site in Fort Myers, Florida.

—Ed Perratore
 
More on lawn gear:
Don’t hit the stores before you’ve checked out our free buying advice for mowers and tractors.  Subscribers can view our Ratings for push mowers, self-propelled mowers, and lawn tractors
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Pricing: 2011 Chevrolet Cruze - Promising new sedan to reach dealers next week

Pricing: 2011 Chevrolet Cruze - Promising new sedan to reach dealers next week

General Motors has begun production of the 2011 Chevrolet Cruze sedan for North America; the first cars will be delivered to dealerships next week. Produced at GM's Lordstown, Ohio plant, the company hopes the Cruze will finally be a more competitive small car than they've had in the past. The Cruze has already sold 165,000 units overseas, making it the most popular Chevrolet car worldwide this year, second only to the Silverado pickup truck.

In our recent first drive of the car, we found it to feel substantial and more refined than the outgoing Cobalt with good handling, responsive steering, and a roomy cabin. We'll know more when we buy our test model.

Pricing is set to start at $16,995 for the base LS model, which comes with a standard 1.8-liter, four-cylinder engine and a six-speed manual transmission. Standard safety features include 10 air bags, stability control, traction control, and antilock brakes. Other features include power windows and door locks, remote keyless entry, OnStar, and satellite radio.

The LT model starts at $18,895 and comes with a turbocharged, 1.4-liter, four-cylinder engine, an automatic transmission, and 16-inch wheels.

The 2LT model will start at $21,395 and has the turbo engine, plus a power driver's seat, leather and heated seats, and leather-covered steering wheel and shift knob. Other features include Bluetooth, USB port, and steering-wheel audio controls.

The Eco (the fuel-sipping version) will start at $18,895 and will come with the turbo engine and manual transmission, and 17-inch wheels with low-rolling resistance tires. GM says that special aerodynamic and powertrain enhancements promise to deliver 40 mpg on the highway.

The LTZ will start at $22,695. It builds on the 2LT model, adding automatic climate control, cruise control, park assist, and 18-inch wheels.

We look forward to purchasing the Cruze once it hits dealerships and will put it through our battery of tests in the coming weeks. In the meantime, watch our video for our first impressions.

Liza Barth

Next Steps

All Small Car Ratings
Subscribers can view and compare all Small Car Ratings.
Recommended Small Cars
Look at the ones that we chose as the best of the best.
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Q: Is a bedbug infestation covered by my homeowners' insurance?

Q: Is a bedbug infestation covered by my homeowners' insurance?

Dealing With Bedbugs art A: No. The Insurance Information Institute, representing the property and casualty insurance industry—including homeowners and auto insurers—notes in a recent blog that costs associated with getting rid of bedbugs and other vermin is considered part of home maintenance and isn't covered in a standard homeowners' or renters' policy.

However, if you're a renter in New York, you now will have access to information about whether an apartment you're renting or intend on renting has had a recent infestation. The Wall Street Journal reports on a new state law that would require landlords to disclose past bedbug infestations.

Homeowners insurance doesn't cover bedbugs, but it does reimburse you for mishaps you might not expect, including food spoilage in your fridge and freezer due to a covered peril (wind and fire, for instance); the stained-glass window your child's baseball destroys on your neighbor's property; and jewelry stolen from you while traveling. (No surprise, you'll have to meet deductibles and adhere to other limitations.)

Homeowners coverage pays for your property losses even if an airplane falls from the sky and lands in your front window. Riders or add-ons to standard insurance indemnify you for costs related to recovering your good name after identity theft, and to defending yourself in a libel or slander lawsuit.

The III outlines what's covered by a standard homeowners insurance policy. Check Consumer Reports' advice on buying homeowners insurance, and our unique Ratings of homeowners companies.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Ford Mustang V6 outperforms Chevrolet Camaro in V6 face-off

Ford Mustang V6 outperforms Chevrolet Camaro in V6 face-off

FORD MUSTANG V6 OUTPERFORMS CHEVROLET CAMARO IN V6 FACE-OFF

The Ford Mustang earned a Very Good road test score and outscored the Chevrolet Camaro which earned a Good score, in a face-off between V6 versions of the two vehicles in Consumer Reports’ October issue.

In last year’s CR face-off between V8 versions of these two iconic cars, the Mustang also outscored the Camaro, despite being an older design.

Opting for a V6 engine did not overly dilute the fun factor in driving the Mustang, but it did for the Camaro. The Ford’s new V6 engine is not only more refined than the Camaro’s, it delivered stronger acceleration and better fuel economy. The Camaro provides decent acceleration, but it’s not as readily available. The car rides well enough but it’s almost 300 pounds heavier than the Mustang.

 “The Mustang is the more agile and enjoyable car to drive of the two,” said David Champion, senior director of Consumer Reports’ Auto Test Center in East Haddam, Connecticut. 

Prices for the vehicles were $28,660 for the Mustang to $28,195 for the Camaro.

While the Mustang is Recommended, the Camaro is too new for Consumer Reports to have reliability data. CR only Recommends vehicles that have performed well in its tests, have at least average predicted reliability based on CR’s Annual Auto Survey of its more than seven million print and Web subscribers, and performed at least adequately if crash-tested or included in a government rollover test.

Full tests and ratings for both vehicles appear in the October issue of Consumer Reports, which goes on sale September 7. Check out testing videos of the Mustang and the Camaro at http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/video-hub/featured/featured-videos/faceoff-mustang-vs-camaro/17387256001/594183805001/. The reports are also available to subscribers of www.ConsumerReports.org. Updated daily, ConsumerReports.org is the go-to site for the latest auto reviews, product news, blogs on breaking news and car buying information.

The Mustang corners well, with good steering and little body lean. The Ford Mustang V6 Premium ($28,660 Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price as tested,) is powered by a 305-hp 3.7 liter V6 engine that is quick and gets 24 mpg overall in CR’s own fuel economy tests. The six-speed manual transmission shifts crisply. Braking is Very Good. The interior is well-finished and the dashboard has a retro look, reminiscent of the 1960s.

The Camaro feels relatively ungainly, with slower steering response than the Mustang and more lean. The ride is taut yet not uncomfortable. The Chevrolet Camaro 2LT ($28,195 MSRP as tested,) is powered by a 304-hp 3.6-liter V6 engine and gets 21 mpg overall. The six-speed manual transmission is rather stiff and imprecise. Braking is Very Good. The interior is well-finished, and the thick-rimmed, leather-covered steering wheel is nicer than the Mustang’s.

 With more than 7 million print and online subscribers, Consumer Reports is one of the most trusted sources for information and advice on consumer products and services. It conducts the most comprehensive auto-test program of any U.S. publication or Web site and owns and operates a 327-acre Auto Test Center in Connecticut. The organization’s auto experts have decades of experience in driving, testing, and reporting on cars. To subscribe, consumers can call 1-800-234-1645 or visit www.ConsumerReports.org.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Get CRH Best Buy Drugs on your mobile phone

Get CRH Best Buy Drugs on your mobile phone

Best buy drugs mobileYou’ve always been able to get Consumer Reports Health Best Buy Drugs information for free here on our website where we cover hundreds of medications to treat dozens of conditions like statins for high cholesterol, proton-pump inhibitors for acid reflux, or blood pressure medications. But quietly last month, we added a new way for you to get at this valuable information: your mobile phone.

Yes, Best Buy Drugs has made the jump to mobile. (Don’t worry, we’ll still be here online, for free, and always updating our reports to help you choose the most effective, safest and least expensive medication whenever possible.)

With the mobile application, now you can be anywhere—the doctor’s office, the pharmacy counter, or simply away from home—and still have access to detailed drug information on devices like the iPhone, iTouch, iPad, Blackberry or Android.

You should also know that the mobile application is the result of a collaboration with two groups: Unbound Medicine and the American Society of Health Systems Pharmacists. (See here for more details.) The application is called Family Drug Guide and costs $4.99 to download.

The editors at Consumer Reports Health Best Buy Drugs

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Buzzword: Graphite foam technology

Buzzword: Graphite foam technology

Graphic_foam_technology What it means: With the U.S. Open in full swing, you might expect graphic foam to have something to do with tennis rackets. In fact, it’s being touted as the next big thing in light-emitting diodes, or LEDs. Developed by James Klett (at right), a researcher at the Energy Department’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), graphic foam promises to keep LEDs cooler than current materials, extending the bulbs’ lives while lowering their costs.
 
Why the buzz? LEDs are already being called the wave of the future in lighting, thanks to their long lives. Consumer Reportspreliminary tests have confirmed some of that promise, though we’ll need more time to know if LEDs last the claimed 50,000 hours.
 
If LEDs don’t last as long as promised, it will likely be because too much heat is being generated at their junctions. Heat sink materials such as copper and aluminum, as well as funky-looking fins, are now used to manage this heat. But none are effective as graphite foam, claims ORNL. “The material’s high thermal conductivity, low weight, and easy machinability give it greater design flexibility and make it a lighter, cheaper, and more efficient cooling option,” reads the news release.

LED North America has signed an exclusive license to use graphite foam technology in its replacement bulbs and commercial lighting. 

—Daniel DiClerico
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Can the right mattress help you lose weight?

Can the right mattress help you lose weight?

Cr052k10-tech-esting-mattresses Well, not really. But it could give you a better night’s sleep, which a study published this week in the journal Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine finds might help in the battle of the bulge. The study, which focused on children up to 13-years-old, concluded that insufficient shuteye early in life may be “a lasting risk factor for subsequent obesity.”
 
Consumer Reports’ health experts have advice on identifying and treating sleep problems in children. But if you’re the one who’s tossing and turning at night, use our reviews of mattresses, sheets and pillows to make your bed as comfortable as possible.  

—Daniel DiClerico

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Nissan Leaf lease details revealed

Nissan Leaf lease details revealed

2011-Nissan-Leaf-leasing
Last week, we published some of the surprisingly high expenses facing early buyers of the Nissan Leaf. For example, people are finding that having a charging dock installed could be more expensive than they bargained for. (Read: "Nissan Leaf electric-car charger installation cost proves shocking.") Now those buyers are also learning the details of Nissan's advertised $349-a-month lease deal.

That price sounded too good to be true, especially for a $33,000 car. Digging a little deeper, we found that to get down to that $349-a-month, three-year deal requires the $7,500 income tax rebate and a $1,999 capital cost reduction, the leasing equivalent of a down payment. Other extra costs include a $595 acquisition fee and a $395 disposition fee. That adds up to a total out-of-pocket cost of  $15,553. Aside from the tax rebate, the deal is structured like a traditional lease.
Consumers with good credit (Tier 1, or a FICO score of 700 or above), will see a money factor of .00224, or the equivalent of an interest rate of about 5.4 percent. With less than optimum credit, the monthly rate would increase. (Learn about lease rates.)

Although the Leaf can only go about 100 miles before needing an overnight (or longer) recharge, the lease comes with a generous 15,000 mile-per-year allowance. As with all leases, additional miles will cost extra.

The residual after three years on a base SL model will be 45 percent, or $14,423.20, based on the Leaf's MSRP of $32,780. (That doesn't include the destination charge of $820.)

The advertised deal is for three years. Longer and shorter terms are available for different rates, with different residuals. And, of course, your credit will vary. (Learn about buying vs leasing.)

For more details on other lease terms, check out the mynissanleaf.com user forum, which breaks down the factors behind other lease terms.

Also read: Nissan announces roll-out plan for electric Leaf

Eric Evarts

See our guide to fuel economy for advice on saving gasoline. Learn about future technologies in our guide to alternative fuels.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Nikon unveils three new Coolpix digital cameras

Nikon unveils three new Coolpix digital cameras

Nikon Coolpix P7000 digital camera point-and-shoot
The $500 Nikon Coolpix P7000 digital camera
Photo: Nikon

Today, Nikon unveiled three new point-and-shoot cameras for enthusiasts and people willing to spend a bit more for a stylish camera.

The most interesting, the 10-megapixel Nikon Coolpix P7000, $500, is for those who want lots of flexibility, but may not want a camera that uses interchangeable lenses. The P7000 appears destined to compete with our top rated advanced point-and-shoot, the Canon PowerShot G11, which is nearly a year old.

The P7000 has lots of features, including the ability to shoot RAW files, plus a hot shoe for an external flash. As the photo shows, it's also covered with dials and buttons that let you set ISO, white balance, various types of bracketing, exposure compensation and manual focus. The P7000 also bucks the trend that so many other point-and-shoots have followed: It has an optical viewfinder, which includes a diopter adjustment dial for those who wear eye glasses.

The P7000's zoom range is 28mm-200mm, longer than Canon's G11. Other features include a virtual horizon indicator, which lets you line up your horizon line so that it's level. Nikon says this is the first Coolpix to include a mic input, letting you hook up an external stereo microphone. It captures 720p HD video at 24 frames per second, and has a top ISO of 6400. One feature the P7000 doesn't have that the G11 has is a swiveling LCD. However, it does have a high pixel count, which means the 3-inch display should be sharp.

The Coolpix P7000 will be available in late September.

Nikon also announced two basic subcompacts:

  • The 12-megapixel Coolpix S8100, $300 (which replaces the Nikon Coolpix S8000), has a 10x zoom, can capture 1080p HD video, and has a High Dynamic Range (HDR) mode. Unlike with many basic models, Nikon claims you can optically zoom while capturing video. It will be available in three colors in late September.
  • The 14-megapixel Coolpix S80, $330, is a thin, sleek subcompact, with a nontelescoping 5x zoom, with a zoom range of 35mm-175mm. Like its predecessor, the Nikon Coolpix S70, it has a 3 1/2-inch LCD touchscreen, but this model has a higher dot count than the S70, which should make it sharp. Nikon says this model will be available in six colors this fall.

—Terry Sullivan

Next Steps

All Digital Camera Ratings
Subscribers can view and compare all Digital Camera Ratings.
Recommended Digital Cameras
Look at the ones that we chose as the best of the best.
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
August car sales and how they will impact September car deals

August car sales and how they will impact September car deals

NewCarBuying

Last week automakers announced their August sales numbers, and the news was quite mixed. Even though most mainstream manufacturers posted double-digit declines over last August, the year-to-date sales are mostly up for all brands, with luxury brands showing significant strength.

It is no surprise that automakers are continuing to struggle amid the recession, with industry sales expected to be about 5 million vehicles less than just a few years ago. But the numbers look even more dynamic compared to this time last year, especially for those brands who benefited from the sales spike caused by the Cash for Clunkers program. Many consumers think that a rough time for sellers will mean more deals for buyers, especially with the model-year change over, but that may not be the case this fall.

Among the top automakers, the major Asian brands are having a tough year. Toyota is down one percent and Honda is up just one percent so far this year. The recall issues and safety concerns are the main reasons for Toyota woes; the automaker is working to turn its fortunes around, with an expansion of safety equipment on 2011 models and significant investment in marketing.

Despite the financial troubles faced just a year ago, the domestics are faring better with Chrysler up 10 percent, Ford up 14 percent, and GM up six percent so far for the first eight months of 2010.

One key industry change is the inventory levels. In 2008, August inventories t for GM were at a generous 82-day supply, in 2009 that dropped to 64 and this year it’s a more desirable 57. Ford was at an 83-day supply in August 2008, in 2009 down to 48, and now they have ramped up a little bit to 57. Chrysler was at 108 in 2008 and dropped to 40 in 2009 and now is maintaining a 55-day supply. (Some of the drop in inventory last year were from the Cash for Clunkers program cleaning dealers out of their fuel-efficient models and the impact of Chrysler and GM bankruptcy proceedings.) This puts domestic inventory in a much more comfortable place, with supply being closer to demand, though still above 2009 levels. Known for tighter inventories, Toyota and Honda have generally stayed the same through this tumultuous period, now at 51 and 49, respectively. So, what does that mean for car buyers this season?

Excess inventory leads to dramatic discounts. This fall dealerships will need to clear out the 2010 models, but as illustrated above, they may not be as anxious to do so as in years past. For consumers, this means less negotiating room and selection.

However, the remaining 2010s should still be priced well under the new 2011 models. Because the customer incentives won’t be as large, car shoppers should carefully consider the benefits and trade-offs before choosing to by a year-end model. After all, a 2010 car purchased now will essentially have depreciated a full year’s worth soon as it rolls off the lot. This wouldn’t matter to a person who holds on to cars for many years, or drives more than an average number of miles and may be concerned about trade-in value. For all other buyers, think twice.

Similarly, as the 2011 models are beginning to arrive, local inventories will be small and dealers are less likely to negotiate. Remember, they need to purge the lot of 2010s. Discounts on 2011 models may not emerge for a while, with the end of the calendar year the next time when you can count on big savings. (See our report "Should you buy an all-new car or a proven carry-over car?")

Whether you buy a 2010 or 2011, be sure to do your homework. Understand how the models do in Consumer Reports testing, safety evaluations, and reliability. But also look at what’s coming for the new models. Sometimes new features and performance are worth spending extra or waiting for. (See our Best new Car Deals.) 

Use our New Car Selector to sort and filter by the factors that matter most to you, or dig right in to the detailed model overview pages

Liza Barth with Jeff Bartlett

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Want a lawn to dye for? Consider these options

Want a lawn to dye for? Consider these options

Painting_lawns This summer's prolonged hot weather and the resulting parched lawns have some homeowners considering alternatives to their suburban carpet of greenery. To save water, money and time, a number of  homeowners featured in the Wall Street Journal have replaced their lawns with "xeriscaping" gardens (based on the Greek word for dry) that use less-thirsty, more heat-tolerant plants. But while some municipalities are offering residents "cash-for-grass" incentives to replace lawns with low-water-use gardens, others find them unsightly and even fine homeowners who don't follow neighborhood ordinances that require turf grass.
 
Those folks may want to consider another option that keeps their existing grass intact but, well, a little less natural than intended. Numerous companies, as told in an ABC-TV report, will do what all your efforts could not—turn your lawn a painterly green. The company profiled in the report, Lawn Smart USA, claims their lawn paint is environmentally safe, stains no more than any grass, and leaves no odors. It also lasts for three months—as long as the grass isn’t growing too fast or getting mowed too often.
 
Can’t stand real grass with artificial color? Perhaps you’d prefer artificial grass with real color. The fake grass you’ve seen in some sports stadiums is also available for residential properties. It’s clearly not for everyone, especially if you want to attract, say, birds to a feeder. Synthetic turf also tends to heat up more than the natural stuff. (And concerns have been raised about the presence of lead in some artificial turf fields.) But if you’ve had it with watering, fertilizing, and weeding, synthetic may be more friend than faux.

Of course, painting or replacing your lawn is not cost free. So if you’re like most people, you’re realizing right about now that it’s time to invest in next year’s hopefully healthier lawn. Do whatever weeding you can—this is the first time since spring that you can get ahead of the growth—and put down the best quality seed you can buy. Use our lawn planting tips to help choose and apply seed and sod. And unless local laws restrict it, water liberally to get the grass pushing up before the leaves start falling.
 
—Ed Perratore
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
First Look: The budget Blackberry Curve 3G 9300

First Look: The budget Blackberry Curve 3G 9300

BlackberryCurve
The RIM BlackBerry Curve 3G, $80 with 2-year
contract with T-Mobile.
Photo: RIM

I've been using a press sample of the new BlackBerry Curve 3G (9300), the apparent successor to the RIM's entry-level BlackBerry Curve 8520. The Curve 3G, available today from T-Mobile for $80 with a two-year contract after rebates, is virtually identical to the 8520, but adds (you guessed it) 3G connectivity for faster file downloads and GPS capability for searching and navigation.

Though it comes with the BlackBerry 5.0 operating system, RIM says the phone will be upgraded in the "coming months" to the newer BlackBerry 6 OS currently available on the BlackBerry Torch 9800. Other Curve specs match the 8520 closely, including its 2.4-in display, a barebones 1.9 megapixel camera, and Bluetooth and Wi-Fi support.

Here are my impressions of the phone:

Palm friendly. As with its ancestor, the Curve 3G fits comfortably in your palm, measuring 4.29 in x 2.36 in. x 0.55 in. And it's also among the lightest smart phones we've tested—just 3.7 oz.

Web browsing. As I expected, browsing the Web over the Curve's 3G connection is noticeably faster than doing so on the 8520's sloth-like 2G network. But viewing pages on a low-resolution screen that's less than 1-3/8 in. tall is a challenge. Zooming in on pictures only made them blurrier, though YouTube videos ran surprisingly smoothly.

GPS. You can perform Web searches based on your GPS locations as well as get turn-by-turn driving directions, but you may want to keep a stand-alone personal navigation device handy. The Curve 3G's maps are fairly rudimentary and the tiny display may be hard to see if you mount the phone to your windshield. Also, there doesn't appear to voice prompts—or if that capability does exist, I couldn't get it to work.

Solid navigation. The trademark BlackBerry menu, back, and hang-up/end keys along with the optical trackpad provide easy access to the Curve 3G's functions, features, and applications.

Typing. As with other Curve models, the keyboard is on the small side. But the tiny buttons are raised sufficiently and provide good feedback. I was able, then, to type reasonably fast and accurately, so long as I used the predictive text feature.

Documents and e-mail. As expected, the Curve 3G lets you create and edit documents. Setting up e-mail is also easy; you can access a BlackBerry e-mail address and manage numerous e-mail accounts.

Display. Though small, the 320x240-pixel is adequate given the phone's rudimentary camera and Web browser. But I found it did an excellent job displaying e-mails and attachments.

Bottom line: The Curve 3G offers a welcome, if modest, step forward in upgrading the economy-class BlackBerrys. Its price is a little steep considering a few dollars more can put a much more capable BlackBerry, such as the Bold 9700 ($100).

—Mike Gikas

Next Steps

All Cell Phone Ratings
Subscribers can view and compare all Cell Phone Ratings.
Recommended Cell Phones
Look at the ones that we chose as the best of the best.
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Do bisphosphonates increase the risk of esophageal cancer?

Do bisphosphonates increase the risk of esophageal cancer?

BisphosphonatesA common complaint about science is that researchers keep changing their minds. It’s true that studies sometimes disagree, because science is a step-by-step process, and often we need lots of different, sometimes contradictory studies before a clear picture emerges.

It doesn’t help that lots of science reporting doesn’t go into detail about how a particular piece of research was done, or give background about the studies that preceded it. So, even if there’s an explanation for contradictory research, there may not be enough information in a typical news report to find it.

Here’s an example. A new study from the BMJ (British Medical Journal) has found a link between bisphosphonate drugs and esophageal cancer. A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association just a few weeks before found no link. And get this: both studies looked at exactly the same group of people.

Bisphosphonates are taken by millions of people to treat conditions like osteoporosis and keep bones strong. They’re even being tested by NASA as a way of keeping astronauts’ bones strong in zero gravity. With so many people taking these drugs, even rare side effects could affect lots of people. Perhaps a closer look at the research can give us a clearer picture of what the risks might be, and why the studies disagree.

One explanation for the conflicting results is a subtle difference in the way the two studies were done. In the BMJ study, researchers went through a database of medical records, took the people with cancer, and then looked back at whether they’d taken bisphosphonates. The JAMA study used the same medical records, but started off by looking at the people taking bisphosphonates, and then following them to see whether they developed cancer. This difference in statistical methods might explain the conflicting results, but unfortunately, it doesn’t tell us which study is right.

In favor of the BMJ study is the fact that it lasted longer. It followed people for 7.7 years on average, while the JAMA study lasted for 4.5 years. In the BMJ study, bisphosphonates were only linked to cancer after people took them for at least three years or had 10 or more prescriptions in a five-year period. So, it's possible that the BMJ study found a risk that the earlier study missed through being too short.

Even if there is a risk with bisphosphonates, how worried should you be? The BMJ study found that having 10 or more prescriptions of bisphosphonates in a five-year period doubled the risk of esophageal cancer. That sounds like a huge increase in risk, but in the US, about 1 in 1,000 people between 60 and 70 develop esophageal cancer during a five-year period. Doubling this risk by taking bisphosphonates would give you a 2 in 1,000 chance. So, in absolute terms, we’re talking about an extra 1 in 1,000 risk of esophageal cancer.

Bisphosphonates have been proven to prevent broken bones, and for older people a broken hip can be life threatening. Cancer is a frightening illness, but it’s still possible that, for some people, the benefits of bisphosphonates outweigh the risk of side effects.

If you’ve had a bone mineral test and are considering treatment with bisphosphonates, make sure you get a clear idea from your doctor what the risks and benefits of treatment are likely to be. According to the National Osteoporosis Foundation, a slightly low bone density score isn’t always a reason to start treatment with drugs, unless you have other factors that put you at risk of a broken bone, such as having had one before, a family history, being very thin, or being a smoker.

There are alternative treatments for osteoporosis (available to subscribers), but they all have their own side effects. Your doctor should be able to help you decide what the best option is, based on your own circumstances.

Non drug treatments are also an option. Your doctor may recommend calcium and vitamin D supplements, and weight-bearing exercise. However, even supplements aren’t risk free.

What you need to know. There is conflicting research on the link between bisphosphonates and esophageal cancer. To minimize the chance of bisphosphonates irritating your esophagus, you should swallow the pills whole, with a large glass of water, and then stand or sit upright for at least half an hour afterward. If you’re taking a bisphosphonate and develop difficulty swallowing, throat or chest pain, or digestive discomfort, see your physician as soon as you can.

Philip Wilson, patient editor, BMJ Group

ConsumerReportsHealth.org has partnered with The BMJ Group to monitor the latest medical research and assess the evidence to help you decide which news you should use.

Learn more about treating osteoporosis and preventing fractures. And for more news and tips, sign up for our Healthy After 60 e-mail newsletter and mobile alerts.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
New report finds a few products still high in heavy metals

New report finds a few products still high in heavy metals

HeavyMetals Consumer Reports’ latest tests of more than 30 children’s and household products indicate that despite sweeping new rules and increased vigilance by manufacturers and retailers, lead continues to appear in a some products, as does cadmium, another toxic heavy metal for which regulatory standards are just now being developed in the U.S.
 
Though children’s developing bodies are especially vulnerable to damage from both lead and cadmium, long-term exposure even at relatively low levels can be hazardous to anyone.  For instance, long-term exposure to cadmium has been linked to adult health problems ranging from high blood pressure and age-related macular degeneration to cancer of the lung, breast, and kidney.

Read more and comment

The Consumer Product Safety Commission is in the process of developing new specific exposure limits for cadmium in children’s products, but currently the CPSC says only that toys must comply with the limit of 75 parts per million (ppm) for soluble cadmium in surface coatings that was established by ASTM-International, an organization that develops voluntary standards.  ASTM also is now working on a children’s jewelry safety standard that will include a strict limit for cadmium.
 
In the absence of clear federal cadmium standards, some states have moved ahead to set their own limits for this toxic metal in children’s jewelry, which has been the target of several recalls.

Cadmium recalls so far have been based on language in the Federal Hazardous Substances Act that prohibits makers of children’s products from using chemicals or metals in amounts that the CPSC considers “hazardous.”

California became the latest state to pass its own cadmium regulation legislation on Aug. 25.  If the bill is signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the new law would effectively ban the use of cadmium in children’s jewelry by prohibiting the manufacturing, shipping or sale of jewelry for children under age 7 if any component of the jewelry contains more than 0.03 percent cadmium by weight.

Consumer groups also have been pushing for further action by federal agencies to reduce exposure to cadmium in consumer products.  In response to a petition filed by the Sierra Club, Empire State Consumer Project and other consumer advocacy organizations, the Environmental Protection Agency in late August agreed to use its authority under the Toxic Substances Control Act to require producers, importers and processors of cadmium and cadmium compounds that are reasonably likely to be incorporated into consumer products to submit copies of both ongoing and completed unpublished health and safety studies to the EPA to help determine whether a cadmium-containing product poses a potential hazard or perhaps even qualifies as a banned hazardous substance under CPSC guidelines.

To guard against risks that remain in the marketplace now, don’t allow children to have or play with cheap metal jewelry, and for children who tend to put things in their mouths, add to that no-no list barrettes, brass keys and charms.  Take an inventory of your children’s toys and check them against the recall list at www.cpsc.gov, which has photos and descriptions of products recalled for cadmium or lead.  Also check that list if you’re buying used items or passing along hand-me-downs.
                  
Our full report on heavy metals appears on our website and in the October 2010 issue of Consumer Reports magazine. 
        
—Andrea Rock
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Daily Dispatch: Google Scribe offers predictive text; Edmunds.com uses game to crowdsource car data

Daily Dispatch: Google Scribe offers predictive text; Edmunds.com uses game to crowdsource car data

Digital Dirk

In today's Digital Dispatch:

Google Scribe (Google Operating System)

...Google Scribe provides text completion service. Using information from what you have already typed in a document, Google Scribe provides related word or phrase completion suggestions.

Edmunds.com Launches Online Car Game with Cash Card Prizes (EarthTimes)

...the Vehicle Ratings Game will enable Edmunds.com to tap the 'wisdom of crowds' and capture subjective data on how people think about the emotional aspects of cars,” said Rob Hardy, Product Manager of Consumer Preferences at Edmunds.com.

Google Home Page Now Showing Search Results As You Type (search engine land)

...Today, there are reports of Google’s home page showing search results as you type your query. You can be on Google.com, see the search box and begin entering your query. As you type, Google may flip you to a search results page without you completing your typing, without hitting enter or without hitting the “Google Search” button.

Archiving Iraq: One Wikipedia Entry's Edit Wars, Printed in 12 Volumes (ReadWriteWeb)

...Boutique book publisher and geek James Bridle has printed the 12,000 edits made to the controversial Wikipedia entry for Iraq War between December 2004 to November 2009 as a 7,000 page, 12 volume set of books.

Lighter side: A Back-to-School Lunch Packing Tip: Get it in writing! (Show & Tell)

...read Jenny Rosenstrach’s brilliantly funny letter to her husband (served by “attorneys” Almuerzo & Snaks) to ensure that he will be packing lunches and snacks exactly HALF of the time this school year.

About Digital Dirk's Dispatches
Dirk Klingner, our technology-trend watcher, sifts through hundreds of blog posts and news articles daily to bring you the Digital Dispatch—a compilation of the most important and interesting tech news for consumers. If you have a tip on a story you want to share, leave a comment below.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Daily electronics deals

Daily electronics deals

Today's electronics deals, courtesy of The Consumerist:

  • Tanga.com: iPhone 4 - 360 Degree Car Mount For $6.99
  • NewEgg: 18.5-inch Acer 1366x768 LCD $99.99 + free ship (next best $110)
  • 6ave.com: 46-inch Toshiba 1080p LCD $746 + free ship (next best $804)
  • Buy.com: GPX Under-Cabinet 8.1" LCD 1080p HDTV w/ Radio Tuner for $60.99 w/ Free Shipping
  • Walmart: Magellan Roadmate 3.5" GPS (Refurbished) for $40 + $3.97 Shipping

Entertainment

  • Buy.com: Playstation Move Starter Bundle $94.99 + free ship (next best $100)
  • Dell Home: Halo Reach 250GB Console Bundle $369.99 + free ship (next best $400)
  • Meijer: Buy One Get One Free Wii Games (26 Selections)
  • Deep Discount: Buy One Get One Blu-Ray DVDs [w/ Coupon LABORBD]

Neither Consumer Reports nor The Consumerist receive anything in exchange for featuring these deals; the posts are intended to be purely informational. These deals are often fleeting, with prices changing or products becoming unavailable as the day progresses.

These posts are not an endorsement of the featured products or the Web sites that sell them—though some of the sites may be included, and recommended, in our Ratings of retailers for computers and other major electronics (both available to subscribers). Price shouldn't be your only criterion. Be wary of lower-priced deals that seem too good to be true, and check return policies for restocking fees and other gotchas.

For general buying advice for many of the products on sale above, check out our free Buying Guides.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Aspirin for your heart

Aspirin for your heart

FasprinThe website for Fasprin, aspirin that dissolves in your mouth, suggests that it works faster than other aspirin to limit damage during a heart attack. It also recommends Fasprin for preventing attacks. And although Bayer says that its Quick Release Crystals are not appropriate for cardiovascular use, it’s easy to see why some people might think they’re a good idea. Are those aspirin products really better than other kinds?

Help during attacks

Nothing has been proven to be better than chewing and swallowing an uncoated, 325-milligram tablet during a heart attack, says Steven Nissen, M.D., chairman of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland Clinic. You would have to take four Fasprins (81 milligrams) to match one regular aspirin. And Bayer says its Quick Release product—which contains 850 milligrams of aspirin, plus caffeine—hasn’t been assessed for treating heart attacks and shouldn’t be used for that purpose.

For prevention

Aspirin can help prevent heart attacks, too. But it’s not for everyone, in part because it can also cause gastrointestinal bleeding. People at very high risk of heart attack or stroke should usually take low-dose aspirin. Men between 45 and 79 without that history should talk with a doctor to determine their 10-year heart-attack risk based on such factors as blood pressure and cholesterol levels. Women between 55 and 79 often also benefit, but only if they have a high 10-year stroke risk. The therapy should generally be limited to those who are not at increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. And everyone should take these steps to maximize aspirin’s benefits and minimize its risks:

Stick with low-dose, 81-milligram (baby) aspirin. Fasprin might be a good choice if you can’t swallow pills, but it costs more than generic forms, and its fast action is largely irrelevant for prevention.

Protect your stomach. If your doctor says you need aspirin, but you have a history of stomach bleeding, ask about adding a stomach-protecting drug such as omeprazole (Prilosec and generic).

Don’t stop on your own. That might elevate your risk beyond the original level by making the platelets in the blood more likely to form clots.

Don’t mix with related pain relievers. Drugs such as ibuprofen (Advil and generic) or naproxen (Aleve and generic) multiply the risk of stomach problems. So try acetaminophen (Tylenol and generic) instead.

Photo: Fasprin 

For more information, see our story on how heart disease is treated.


 

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Family news: October 2010 Consumer Reports

Family news: October 2010 Consumer Reports

Life insurance new parents young children babyProduct tests and advice from the October 2010 Consumer Reports that can make family life better:

Saving money and energy
Will you have enough to retire?
How to save on car insurance, plus Ratings of insurers.
Lost loot may now be found through a wealth of databases.
Saving energy: What you can do.

Child safety and health
Heavy metals found in children’s trinkets, clothing, and more.
How to help a child with ADHD—the 5 most useful actions.
Recalls of child and adult medications.
E-mailing doctors can improve care.

Food
Best burgers for your fast-food dollar.
"Organic milk" and other dairy terms defined.
Safer chicken—but is it safe enough?
Store-brand vs. name-brand foods: Our latest taste-off.

Product tests and tips
Windshield wiper care tips.
Space heater Ratings and safety tips.
Top cordless phones.
Capable camcorders to capture family memories.
Does the Pledge Fabric Sweeper for Pet Hair work?
Buzzworthy vehicles for 2011, plus family sedan Ratings.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
IIHS names best-fitting booster seats of 2010

IIHS names best-fitting booster seats of 2010

ChildCarSeat

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has released its 3rd annual list of the best-fitting booster seats and this year’s list shows that there are more options for parents to find a good fitting seat for children 4 to 8 years old. The IIHS ratings are based solely on how well each booster seat positions the lap and shoulder belt, its primary function, and are not an assessment of crash performance or vehicle fit. A well-fitting booster should put the lap portion of the seat belt flat across a child’s upper thigh and the shoulder belt at mid-shoulder.

Out of 72 booster seats rated this year, 21 of them were considered Best Bets and seven Good Bets. Only nine seats in 2009 received the Best Bet award and 10 in 2008. However, IIHS found eight seats that aren’t recommended because they do a poor job of fitting with the belts. See the list of the IIHS Best Bets below and the full list at www.iihs.org.

Best Bets
Britax Frontier 85 (combination highback)
Chicco Keyfit Strada (dual highback)
Clek Oobr (dual highback)
Cosco Juvenile Pronto (dual highback)
Cybex Solution X-Fix (highback)
Eddie Bauer Auto Booster (dual highback)
Evenflo Big Kid Amp (backless)
Evenflo Maestro (combination highback)
Graco TurboBooster Crawford (dual highback)
Harmony Baby Armor (dual highback)
Harmony Dreamtime (dual backless)
Harmony Dreamtime (dual highback)
Harmony Secure Comfort Deluxe (backless)
Harmony Youth Booster Seat (backless)
Maxi-Cosi Rodi XR (dual highback)
Recaro ProBOOSTER (highback)
Recaro ProSPORT (combination highback)
Recaro Vivo (highback)
Recaro Young Sport (combination highback)
Safety 1st Boost Air Protect (dual highback)
The First Years Pathway B570 (highback)

To conduct this test, the IIHS used a crash-test dummy representing the average six-year old. Engineers measured how well each of the 72 booster seat models positioned the three-point lap and shoulder belts on the dummy under four conditions spanning the range of belt configurations in a variety of vehicle types.

The IIHS test provides an important assessment when choosing a booster seat and educates parents on how belts should fit and what to look for. The IIHS test is based on fit to a dummy that represents an average sized six-year-old child, but as we know, children and cars come in all shapes and sizes, so it’s important to do your own assessment to make sure the belt properly fits your child in their booster. If you determine that the belts fit fine and the seat is positioned properly, then it should provide good protection. Just as we recommend to try a car seat in your car before you buy, it’s also important to try out your child in the seat, as well.

When assessing booster fit, ask these key questions:

  • Does the booster seat position the shoulder belt across the clavicle/collar bone, approximately mid-way between the neck and shoulder?
  • Does the booster seat position the lap belt low and flat across the hips/top of the thighs?
  • Does either the booster seat or vehicle head restraint provide some support behind the child’s head?
  • Is your child comfortable and not tempted to move the belts or themselves out of position after a period of time?
All states have laws for the use of child restraints, but some are stricter than others. Currently, most states have laws that cover children up until age seven but many others don’t require child restraint use above the age of five. A recent study from the American Academy of Pediatrics found that booster seat laws are effective at reducing injuries and deaths in a crash and should be mandated in all states. Variations and confusion in booster seat state laws, seat cost and inconvenience, and child discomfort are reasons why children five- through seven-years old are not always restrained in booster seats—but they should be. Consumer Reports recommends booster seats be used until the child can comfortably and safely fit the vehicle belts alone. If you’re unsure if your child fits the vehicle belts without a booster, ask the same questions as above but without the use of the booster.

To provide the best protection, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) recommends using a booster seat for children until they are at least eight years old or 4’9” tall. Also, all children under age 13 should ride in the rear seat.

If you are unsure if your booster seat or any other child seat you are using in your vehicle is properly installed, have your car seat inspected by certified technicians. To find an inspection station near you go to: http:// www.seatcheck.org or http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cps/cpsfitting/index.cfm. The National Seat Check day is Saturday, September 25th, and inspection events will be set up around the country. This is a good opportunity to have your seat checked and make sure it is properly installed.

For more information on how to choose the right infant, convertible, or booster seats, see our latest buying advice. For more on driving with kids, see our Kids and car safety section.

Liza Barth

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
New Dishwasher Detergents - from Consumer Reports

New Dishwasher Detergents - from Consumer Reports

As of July 1st, limits were placed on the amount of phosphates in dishwasher detergents. Here are the best performers among this new crop of detergents. From Consumer Reports' September issue. Dishwasher Detergents - CR Podcast
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Unsafe by definition: Substantial product hazard

Unsafe by definition: Substantial product hazard

Dictionary
What it is: A “substantial product hazard” is a product safety defect that creates a significant risk of injury to the public. The term can also apply to products that fail to comply with safety rules, regulations, standards, or bans enforced by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. If the CPSC staff determines that a product presents a substantial product hazard, it acts to get it recalled.

Read more and comment

 
Why it's news: The determination of substantial product hazards sits at the heart of the CPSC’s ability to take appropriate action with products that can cause death or injury, even if they're not covered by current safety regulations. Of the 465 recalls that the CPSC executed in their 2009 fiscal year (10/1/08 - 9/30/09), at least 30 percent were based on substantial product hazard determinations. The remainder were based on either violations of federal safety regulations or a volunteer effort by a company to "fast track" the recall process. For almost all recalls, the CPSC evaluates the hazard as well as the remedy proposed by the makers or sellers of the recalled product. 
 
Manufacturers, distributors and retailers who suspect a product has a defect that poses a substantial risk to the public are required by law to immediately report that information to the CPSC.  Those that choose to voluntarily recall the product often escape govenment scrutiny. But those who fail to report safety hazards to the CPSC are subject to fines of up to $100,000 per product and a maximum penalty of $15 million.
 
Essential Information:
 
Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act

Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act Penalties
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Video: Chevrolet Camaro vs Ford Mustang V6 - More and less than the sum of their parts

Video: Chevrolet Camaro vs Ford Mustang V6 - More and less than the sum of their parts

Let me say up front that I've never been a muscle-car kind of guy. I've always put handling finesse before horsepower, and in waking states a BMW M3, Volkswagen GTI, or a Porsche makes my heart beat faster than a Chevrolet Camaro or Ford Mustang. But deep inside I've had a soft spot for those American icons ever since I got my first ones, in a slot car racing set sometime in the early 1970s as a pre-teen. Now that we've just finished testing the latest V6 versions of the Camaro and Mustang, let me reflect. Even after all these years, those two pony cars still exert some kind of elemental animal attraction.

The V6 versions, which screen out the distractions thrown up by the rumble, torque and oversized tires of the V8 models we tested last summer, actually allow for a purer perspective on the underlying cars. (Read the full 2009 muscle and sporty car test, available to online subscribers.) Taking the Ford first, it's clear the folks in Dearborn continue to improve the Mustang breed. Despite mechanical throwbacks like a live rear axle, it drives like a champ: alert, responsive, agile and ready for action. The shifter is a delight, and the 3.7-liter V6 sounds satisfying and pulls strongly. However, the switch to electric power steering that came with the 2011 model year has blunted some of the feedback it had previously. (Privately, some Ford engineers I've spoken with agree with that judgment.) But the electric steering is still quick, linear, and well-weighted and it contributes to average fuel use of 24 mpg - not too shabby for a 300-hp machine. And if the need for speed trumps your green sentiments, the Mustang GT packs a 412-hp, 5.0-liter V8, which brings a terrific sound and, at $36,000, is a performance bargain.

Now consider the Camaro. It was derived from the rear-drive Pontiac G8, a sedan that's held in universal high esteem by driving enthusiasts because of its sophisticated chassis and impeccable road manners. The Camaro employs the G8's basic hardware, but it fails to excite the driver. The steering response and feel is not fitting with a sporty car. The high belt line makes it tough to see out in any direction, which effectively blinds you to the outside world, let alone the next corner. The 312-hp V6 version feels limp and uninvolving to drive. Throw in tall gear ratios, a balky shifter, and the 275-pound weight disadvantage compared to the Mustang, and you find yourself saying, "This car might as well be an automatic." If you are already yawning, I'm not blaming you. 

So while the Camaro may boast a more impressive spec sheet, with state-of-the-art this and that, on the road it amounts to less than the sum of its many precision parts. Conversely, the ostensibly cruder Mustang delivers on a level that surpasses the sum of its parts.

Read our Camaro vs Mustang Face Off, and research the Camaro and Mustang in our model overview pages, where you'll find full performance data, photos, videos, owner cost information, and much more. (See our Dodge Challenger, Camaro, and Mustang video shootout from 2009.)

Now if only I could find my old slot-car set...

Gabe Shenhar

Next Steps

All Sporty car Ratings
Subscribers can view and compare all Sporty car Ratings.
Recommended Sporty cars
Look at the ones that we chose as the best of the best.
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Video: To test this sweeper, we let the fur fly

Video: To test this sweeper, we let the fur fly

Talk about a pet project. To test the claims of the Pledge Fabric Sweeper for Pet Hair, Bernie Deitrick, a program leader at Consumer Reports, enlisted his mixed-breed dog Jade and tabby cats Rexy and Precious.

First, for the purpose of comparison, Deitrick tried a trio of other products. Scotch’s adhesive Lint Roller and the similar Pet Hair Roller both did a workmanlike job of picking up hair from couches, chairs, carpets, pillows and the cats’ favorite resting places. But the sheets were quickly matted with fur, requiring Deitrick to frequently pause and peel off one sheet to expose the next. The sticky Scotch Fur Fighter Hair Remover has a slightly different design­ but it also required peel and re-stick breaks.

With the Pledge Fabric Sweeper’s non-adhesive twin roller, Deitrick was able to collect more fur for longer periods­ and without overly disturbing Rexy as she lolled nearby. And although Pledge says the Sweeper is disposable, it was easy to clean and reuse by just unsnapping a roller and removing the collected hair. So we took the Pledge.

For $5.59, the Pledge Sweeper might be all you want. But if you need to unleash more cleaning power, check our Ratings of upright, canister and handheld vacuum cleaners (available to subscribers), which note the models that excel at an even tougher pet-hair removal tests.

—Gian Trotta

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Hartz dog treats recalled for possible salmonella contamination

Hartz dog treats recalled for possible salmonella contamination

Hartz_DogTreats

Hartz is recalling 74,700 bags of Hartz Naturals Real Beef Treats for Dogs because they may be contaminated with salmonella. The 8-ounce bags have lot code BZ0969101E, UPC number 32700-11519. They were imported from a Brazilian supplier. The company has received no reports of animals or humans becoming sick.

Don’t feed these treats to your dog. The company's recall notice says to dispose of the product in a proper manner, which we presume means in a way that pets can’t get to them. You can contact Hartz at 800.275.1414 for information on how to get a refund.
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Average gas prices--September 6, 2010

Average gas prices--September 6, 2010

Gasoline prices are down in most areas of the country compared to the week before. The national gasoline average is $.09 above the price this time last year. Diesel fuel is about $.28 above this time last year.

National regular gasoline prices
Price Change from last week
Regular gasoline/gallon
$2.68       0
Diesel fuel/gallon
$2.93    .01
Regional regular gasoline prices
East Coast
$2.60   .01
—New England
$2.66   .02
—Central Atlantic
$2.62   ↓ .02
—Lower Atlantic
$2.56       0
Midwest
$2.67   .04
Gulf Coast
$2.52   .01
Rocky Mountain
$2.82       0
West Coast
$3.00  .04
—California
$3.04   ↓ .05

Source: Energy Information Administration, 9/6/10. Figures rounded to the nearest cent.

For more information on saving fuel see our reports on how to get the best gas mileage and where to find the cheapest gas and more in our guide to fuel economy.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Video: Our testers land in hot water—here's the story

Video: Our testers land in hot water—here's the story

Homeowners who need to replace their water heaters have more choices these days and an array of incentives makes those options not only attractive but affordable. Recently we tested three types of water heaters—solar, tankless and hybrid—to see how well they perform their primary task and at what cost.

We put some shiny new solar panels on the roof of our Yonkers headquarters to heat water and then stored it in tanks below. The solar heaters shone when the sun did and are good for the environment. But they're expensive to buy and install and payback time can take 20 years.

Tankless water heaters sound good because they heat just the water you need when you need it. But our testers found that they're not an economical or practical choice for most people.

Under the right circumstances, a hybrid water heater (a storage tank with an added pump that extracts heat from the air) can be a good choice and a consumer can realize savings in years rather than decades. But they're tall—about 7 feet—and you'll need ample space to capture enough heat from the air.

We didn't test conventional heaters but if you're considering one we recommend at least a 9-year warranty because those models tend to have thicker insulation and are better at resisting corrosion. For more information, read the full report from the October issue of Consumer Reports.
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Fast Facts: Drowning statistics

Fast Facts: Drowning statistics

  • FastFacts_FINAL 3,443 Americans drowned in 2007.
  • Drowning is the 2nd leading cause of accidental death among children ages 1 to 14.
  • Each year, about 385 children ages 1 to 14 drown in swimming pools or spas.
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Citibank's required credit-card "upgrade" feels like a downgrade to us

Citibank's required credit-card "upgrade" feels like a downgrade to us

Federal credit card reform has improved life for some cardholders, including preventing card issuers from increasing rates on existing debt in most instances. But it hasn’t stopped all the shenanigans.

Recently, for example, Citibank told customers of its Dividend Platinum Select MasterCard card that they were being upgraded, in most cases to its Citi Dividend World MasterCard.

What does upgrade mean? Partly, it means card holders no longer will receive an automatic 2 percent cash back on purchases made at supermarkets, drugstores, gas stations, convenience stores, and utilities.

Instead, they get at least 2 percent cash back on categories that change every quarter. It’s currently a nice 5 percent on car rentals and hotels. But wait! The incentive isn’t applied automatically, as it was with the old card. Instead, you have to sign up by phone or online every quarter. Forget, and no additional cash back for you!

Why not just sign everyone up automatically?

Citibank says that requiring cardholders to sign up allows it to assess the interest in the offers.

“This enables us to gauge the success of these promotions and tailor them to customer interests in the future," a Citibank spokesman told us.

But Curtis Arnold of Cardratings.com suggests a different motive. “I think they know a lot of folks aren’t going to opt in every quarter,” he told us. “It’s too much of a hassle.”

We’ve seen Chase employ this gotcha for its cards too.

So what other upgrade surprises does Citibank have for its Dividend cardholders?

With the old card, Citibank didn’t pay the rebate until the cardholder accumulated $50 and then requested a check for whatever cash had been earned at that time. (Discover recently lowered its minimum to $20). The process is the same for the new card, but now Citibank will send a check for no more than $50. And what happens to the remaining balance if you close the account? You lose it.

A Citibank spokesman acknowledges that one reason for this is that Citibank is trying to get customers to keep the card.

“It further helps to enhance customer engagement and retention, as there is a tangible reason for customers to continue using the card,” the spokesman said.

It’s notable that Citibank feels it has to threaten punishment to retain customers. Maybe Citibank should consider, instead, making the card the best one out there by getting rid of all the gotchas? That’s a better way to retain customers

Bill Hardekopf of Lowcards.com thinks it unfair, too.

“If you close out your account, you should be able to redeem the full amount you earned,” he says.

Why can’t Citibank and other card issuers simply send the entire accumulated amount  automatically or, better yet, credit them to your account monthly, as Citibank does, for example, with the Citibank Sunoco MasterCard?

The Citibank MasterCard Citi Dividend World MasterCard does give owners of the previous card some additional benefits, such as price protection, trip cancellation/trip interruption coverage, and lost luggage coverage. But for some, those perks may count for little compared to the new gotchas.

And there’s one more gotcha. In issuing the new card, Citibank changed the card numbers. Now cardholders have to provide their new numbers to any companies that automatically bill to their cards. If you forget, you could end up with late charges, credit report dings, or even fines.

That’s not what I call an upgrade.—Anthony Giorgianni
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
Daily Dispatch: Google TV to arrive this fall; Nevada candidate proposes pay to speed program

Daily Dispatch: Google TV to arrive this fall; Nevada candidate proposes pay to speed program

Digital Dirk

In today's Digital Dispatch:

Fall to bring Google TV, just in time for Apple TV faceoff (ars technica)

...Because it will be Android-based and search-driven, third-party developers are expected to hop on board with a plethora of TV offerings—companies like Netflix and Amazon have already created native apps to run on Google TV.

Facebook Adds News Search (ReadWriteWeb)

Facebook has begun surfacing widely "liked" news stories from independent media organizations in its basic search bar today, it appears.

Deloitte Report Finds Major Role for Mobile Devices in Health Care (eWeek)

...According to the Deloitte survey results, 50 percent of consumers would want a device to monitor their medical condition and guide them on how to improve.

Twitter-Based Customer Service: How Best Buy Gets It Right (MarketingProfs)

In a minor stroke of genius, Best Buy created @Twelpforce, a Twitter-based means to pose tech questions and get answers in real time.

Forget Product Placement; Get Ready For Product Anti-Placement (techdirt)

...They are not sending her their own bags. They are sending her each other's bags! Competitors' bags!

U. of Kentucky Encourages Students to Check In via Facebook (Advertising Age)

...The University of Kentucky has planted giant, wooden pointer thingies -- like the tab that marks the map in the Facebook Places logo -- on its campus to encourage students to check in at school.

Nevada Candidate Proposes 'Pay to Speed' Traffic Bill (Minyanville)

...Keeping in line with the Silver State's freewheeling libertarian attitude, nonpartisan candidate Eugene "Gino" DiSimone has an unorthodox plan for boosting revenue and fixing the budget crisis. In what he's calling the "free limit plan," motorists can pay a $25 fee for the privilege to drive up to 90 miles per hour on designated highways.

About Digital Dirk's Dispatches
Dirk Klingner, our technology-trend watcher, sifts through hundreds of blog posts and news articles daily to bring you the Digital Dispatch—a compilation of the most important and interesting tech news for consumers. If you have a tip on a story you want to share, leave a comment below.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
When TLC means “Total Lack of Circuits”

When TLC means “Total Lack of Circuits”

963326_abandoned_pauwels(2) TLC officially stands for “tender loving care”, but as the New York Times reports today, the acronym has been open to looser and looser interpretation. Take the two-bedroom apartment on Manhattan’s Upper East Side that was recently listed as needing TLC, but in fact was missing not just all of its appliances, but also any working electrical circuits.
 
With home sales down and foreclosures on the rise, liberal use of "needs TLC" is likely to increase nationwide. If you’re in the market for a new home, learn what red flags might indicate major structural damage, and read our advice on buying a foreclosed property.
 
And if you’re lucky enough to find a true diamond in the rough, check our Home Remodeling and Improvement Guide for advice on paint, countertops, and other materials that will provide just the right amount of tender love and care.
 
—Daniel DiClerico
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
The new issue is here! Energy savings and new ratings

The new issue is here! Energy savings and new ratings

Blog_energy It's not that Americans aren't trying to be more energy efficient. In Consumer Reports' recent survey of 1,536 U.S. homeowners we found that 81 percent bought energy-efficient lightbulbs, 44 percent had purchased an Energy Star appliance and 43 percent caulked their windows and doors, among other good deeds. Why did they do this? To lower their energy costs, reduce the impact on the environment or to take advantage of a rebate or credit.

We also learned from experts and consumers that being energy efficient is harder than it should be. Though the Energy Star program has saved people billions in utility bills, it should and could deliver even greater savings, as our lab tests continue to show. And government rebate programs, designed to encourage energy-efficient choices, are too complicated and confusing for many consumers. In the October issue of Consumer Reports, online and on newsstands today, we outline things the government can do to help consumers and things you can do to help yourself. We also have new Ratings of lightbulbs and space heaters and a report on water heaters.

Lightbulbs
The compact fluorescent bulbs in our labs have been cycling on and off since early 2009, or 6,000 hours. For comparison, a typical incandescent bulb lasts only around 1,000 hours. Even after all that time, brightness and warm-up times remained virtually the same as after 3,000 hours of testing. Our results were confirmed by an outside lab. See our new Ratings (for subscribers) of spiral, indoor flood/ reflector, outdoor flood/ reflector and porch/ post covered bulbs.

We're also keeping our eye on the latest generation of light-emitting diodes (LEDs), which claim to rival the look, dimming ability, and light quality of incandescents; contain no mercury (as CFLs do); and last up to five times longer than CFLs and 50 times longer than incandescents.

Space heaters
Practically any heater can help make a chilly room more inviting. Our latest tests show that the best do that more consistently, conveniently, and safely than ever for as little as $60—not the hundreds you can spend on a fancy infomercial model. We focused on electric heaters, the best-selling type by far. There are 13 models in our Ratings and we recommend five of them. If you're considering a space heater, remember that portable space heaters cause an estimated 21,650 home fires and 1,512 fire-related injuries and deaths each year so you should follow these safety precautions.

Water heaters
As recently as last year, replacing a broken water heater meant paying a few hundred dollars for a relatively inefficient storage-tank unit or spending thousands to eke out energy savings with a solar or tankless system. But smarter new heaters are changing that. Three we tested saved enough energy to pay for their roughly $2,000 cost in about five to seven years rather than decades. Known as hybrids, they have a conventional electric storage heater paired with a heat pump that extracts heat from the air and uses it to help heat the water. Check out the payback time for hybrid, solar and tankless water heaters. You can also save with the right conventional water heater.
Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
1
LG DARE PHONE is a Niche Store / Blog template designed by The Niche Store Builder. The site is powered by WordPress Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).